Three routes, kept distinct
The right arrangement depends on what your project already holds and what its intended destination has requested. We distinguish the technical review from team verification, then coordinate only the work that remains relevant.
An existing report or confirmation can be considered before a new provider is approached. The central question is whether it refers to the contract, version, or entity relevant to your next submission. We can also coordinate alongside CoinMarketCap listing support or CoinGecko listing support, while keeping each application’s evidence distinct.
| Route | Independent provider | Coordinated handoff |
|---|---|---|
| Contract audit | Auditor reviews the agreed code scope | Scope notes, report, and evidence index |
| Team KYC | KYC provider conducts verification | Provider confirmation and disclosure notes |
| Both workstreams | Separate auditors and KYC provider | Aligned sequence with separate records |
A private desk, with clear approvals
Your named point of contact keeps provider communication and project decisions in one place. At the outset, we establish who may answer technical questions, who approves provider selection, and who is authorized to release project materials.
There are 2 sign-off points: approval of the proposed review route before provider coordination, and approval of the evidence packet before external submission. A concise written status note records open inputs, the responsible party, and the next handoff. This keeps decisions visible without spreading sensitive project details across informal conversations.
KYC materials are handled by the relevant provider. Sensitive identity documents remain with that provider unless a different handling arrangement is agreed and appropriate. We can coordinate with the provider using project information you have approved, and nothing is submitted to a data site or launchpad without your sign-off.
Which evidence route fits your destination?
A useful route begins with the destination’s stated request and the records already available to you. The aim is to identify gaps before commissioning additional work, not to assume every project needs the same review.
Contract coverage
Check the report’s contract address, network, version, stated scope, and any exclusions. If the code or deployment has changed, note that clearly before relying on an older report. Keep remediation notes with the corresponding report when available.
Destination fit
Gather the written request or current requirements from each intended platform. For a broader submission route, see listings and verification. If a destination’s question concerns token supply, keep that evidence separate and consider circulating supply verification. This distinction makes the packet easier to explain and review.
Team verification
Confirm which individuals or entities the KYC provider covers and what its confirmation permits you to disclose. Do not treat a team verification record as technical evidence about contract code.
The records prepared for your team
The handoff brings the relevant documents and coordination status together without presenting our agency as the auditor or verifier. You receive an orderly record of what each independent provider covered and what your team has approved for onward use.
Where a project also needs an official profile contact or community reference, CoinMarketCap community verification is a separate workstream. If the contract has migrated or the project has changed its identity, migration and rebranding updates may help keep the related records aligned.
- Scope summary: the agreed review subject and provider responsibilities.
- Input record: materials supplied and questions still awaiting an answer.
- Provider documents: the report or confirmation the provider issues.
- Evidence index: clear references to the relevant contract, version, network, or entity.
- Submission note: what is being shared, with which destination, and by whom.
A note on provider and platform decisions
The independent review belongs to the provider; your team retains control of what it shares.
The auditor alone determines its findings and coverage; the KYC provider decides its verification and badge. CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, and each launchpad separately decide whether evidence meets their current review and how any badge appears, so acceptance or display cannot be promised.
Our part is to coordinate the agreed provider handoffs, organize the records, and make the submission packet available for your approval. Before any document is presented, check that it names the right contract and entity, explains the scope, and reflects any relevant changes. Keep a record of the destination, the materials shared, and the written request they answer.
One coordinated sequence for wider listing work
Audit and KYC coordination can sit beside listing preparation, while each destination keeps its own application and evidence requirements. We help keep the contract version, project entity, and supporting records consistent across the workstreams.
For projects approaching both major data sites, the evidence route can be coordinated alongside separate CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko listing work. The project team decides who approves provider selection and who may share project or identity materials. Our named contact keeps those decisions together and records the agreed next action.
The conversation begins privately and may stay at the level of your target platforms and project stage; you need not disclose sensitive identity files at that point. Your named point of contact will answer and explain the next handoff.
How it works
- Establish the destinationShare the platforms you plan to approach and any written requests received. Your named contact records the intended outcome and the project decision-makers.
- Map existing evidenceProvide available contract details, reports, or KYC confirmations. We note what each record covers and where a provider clarification may be needed.
- Approve the routeWe outline the proposed scope and provider handoffs. Coordination proceeds after you approve the route and the information to be shared.
- Coordinate providersWe support provider briefing and track open inputs in a written status note. Your team answers project-specific questions and supplies approved materials.
- Review the handoffWe organize the resulting records and show the proposed packet for your sign-off. After approval, the agreed materials are prepared for the intended destination.
Frequently asked questions
Who conducts the technical review of our contract?
An independent third-party auditor conducts the technical review and issues its own findings. We coordinate the agreed scope, provider handoff, and requested inputs. Before work begins, your team approves the proposed route and can confirm that the auditor’s scope refers to the relevant contract.
Can an existing audit report support a new contract version?
Only if its stated scope covers the relevant code and deployment. Compare the report’s contract address, network, version, and exclusions with the version you intend to present. We can organize that comparison and identify questions for the auditor before the record is included in a submission packet.
How are confidential KYC documents handled?
The KYC provider conducts verification and handles identity materials. Those documents remain with the provider unless another handling arrangement is agreed and appropriate. We coordinate only with information you approve, and your team signs off before any evidence is shared with a data site or launchpad.
Can the same arrangement include an audit and team KYC?
Yes. We can coordinate both workstreams while keeping their purposes and records separate. The auditor reviews the agreed contract scope; the KYC provider verifies the individuals or entities covered by its process. The handoff shows which provider issued each document.
Once we are underway, how long does audit and KYC coordination take?
The sequence is set after the project materials, intended scope, and provider processes are understood. Provider review schedules and follow-up questions shape the timing. Before coordination begins, we clarify the expected handoffs and record which inputs remain with your team.
Can you ensure a launchpad or data site accepts the evidence?
No. The auditor determines its findings, the KYC provider controls its verification and badge, and each destination decides what it accepts and displays. We can coordinate the agreed work and prepare the evidence packet for your approval, but the destination’s decision remains its own.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…