A private working arrangement
Your product notes, architecture materials and draft screens stay within the working discussion until you approve their use. A named point of contact coordinates the work, so questions, decisions and approvals have one composed route rather than several disconnected conversations.
At the outset, we clarify who on your side may see working materials and who can approve product decisions. Draft interfaces are presented for your comments before implementation. Submission materials are also shown for written sign-off before they are sent to an app store. Nothing is presented as final while key choices remain open.
This arrangement is particularly useful when a mobile app involves unreleased product plans, wallet flows or internal technical documentation. You can provide the information needed for planning while retaining control over what is shared beyond the project team. Confidentiality is handled as a working practice, not as a decorative promise: access, review and approval are discussed before delivery begins.
The product format follows the user’s task
The first decision is what a user needs to accomplish on a phone, not whether the brief calls for every possible feature. A wallet, DeFi front end, loyalty product and community app each create different journeys, information needs and integration questions.
For a standalone iOS or Android app, define the essential user action, the information needed before that action. The services the app must reach. Native development may suit requirements tied closely to a particular platform; a cross-platform approach may suit a shared experience across both. The decision is made against your product constraints and agreed requirements, rather than as a default.
A Telegram mini app serves a different access context from a standalone mobile app. If your decision is still open, compare the brief with Telegram mini-app development and the wider Web3 development picture. When assessing agencies for TON mini-apps, first establish whether users need a Telegram experience or an app-store product. That distinction changes the design and delivery brief.
The approval points, set out plainly
The work is easiest to oversee when each stage has a visible owner and a clear approval point. This table shows how we arrange the main decisions before moving from one stage to the next.
| Step | Who is involved | What you approve |
|---|---|---|
| Product scoping | Your product lead and our named contact | User journeys, target platforms and first-release priorities |
| Interface design | Your approver and the design team | Proposed screens, navigation and key app states |
| Integration planning | Your technical owner and the delivery team | Wallet, blockchain, backend and API responsibilities |
| Testing and submission preparation | Your product team and our delivery team | Tested flows, submission materials and handoff |
The agreed work can include product scoping, UI/UX design, iOS and Android development, wallet and blockchain integration, backend and API work, testing, app-store submission support and post-launch support. A kickoff checklist records dependencies, available assets and the people responsible for decisions. You can see what is included before development starts, rather than discovering open responsibilities during implementation.
Which integration details should be settled early?
Wallet and blockchain requirements should shape the mobile experience from the beginning. Their place in the user journey affects what the app displays, which actions it supports and what your existing services need to provide.
A useful integration note identifies the user action that requires a connection, the data the app must show, and the services that supply it. Include relevant chains, wallet requirements, backend services, APIs and available test environments. Your technical owner can also mark which components already exist and which need development. For wallet-led products, the related crypto wallet development work may help clarify responsibilities. If an on-chain action depends on contract behavior, align the mobile requirements with smart contract development.
The interface should account for ordinary as well as interrupted journeys: loading, missing information, a connection that cannot proceed, and a failed action. These states make the product easier to assess before implementation. If the mobile experience is a companion to a browser product, compare its boundaries with dApp development so both briefs describe the same responsibilities.
Store preparation begins before the final build
Crypto app-store policies belong in early product planning, not only in the final submission checklist. We review the intended app behavior before development starts and keep the submission preparation aligned with the product the team has approved.
- Clarify the product route. Record the app’s functions, target platforms and any wallet or financial features.
- Resolve policy questions early. Identify details that may affect the design or the submission materials.
- Prepare and approve materials. Review the app and its submission information before anything is submitted.
Store policies and review decisions remain under the relevant platforms’ control, and their requirements or interpretation may change. We can review the product direction and prepare the submission, but cannot determine the platform’s decision. The agreed delivery is the work and preparation itself.
A composed route from brief to release
The project moves from product definition through design, development, testing and submission preparation, with your team involved at agreed review points. The timing is set after the platform choices, integrations, backend responsibilities and approval path are clear.
For the first discussion, the useful materials are a short product description, intended users, core mobile actions, platform priorities and any available architecture or API notes. Existing design assets and access to the technical owner help clarify dependencies. If the product is still taking shape, scoping can establish the essential user journeys and record decisions that need your approval.
Progress updates can state completed work, current blockers, decisions needed from your team and the next review point. A named contact keeps that account composed and routes questions to the right people. Where a public-facing site is part of the launch, align the mobile journeys with Web3 website and landing development.
A short note naming your intended launch window or the person who signs off is enough to begin. Your named contact will arrange the first discussion and map the decisions ahead.
How it works
- Share the product contextOutline the intended users, core mobile actions and platform priorities. Include any integration notes or existing product materials you can share.
- Set the working boundariesConfirm user journeys, app-store considerations, technical owners and who approves design and scope.
- Approve the proposed interfaceReview the draft flows and key app states, then resolve feedback before implementation begins.
- Build and test the agreed experienceDevelop the approved app and integrations, then test the intended user flows with your team.
- Prepare submission and handoffReview submission materials and agree the handoff and post-launch support before the app is submitted.
Frequently asked questions
What should the first mobile release let users do?
It should support the core user task without carrying features that are not needed for that journey. During scoping, we map the essential actions, information and integrations, then record what belongs in the first release. Your product lead approves those priorities before design moves forward.
Does a Telegram mini app serve the same role as a mobile app?
No; they are different product formats with different access contexts. The decision starts with where users need to reach the experience and what the product must let them do. We can compare that requirement during scoping before either format is treated as the settled direction.
Can you connect a wallet and backend we already use?
Yes, when the relevant requirements and integration details are available for review. API documentation, wallet requirements, architecture notes and access to a technical owner help establish responsibilities. The named contact records open questions before implementation, so your team can confirm the intended boundaries.
Who approves the design and changes during development?
Your team identifies an approver during kickoff, and that person reviews the proposed flows before development begins. We keep decisions and open questions in progress updates, with a named point of contact coordinating responses. Changes to the agreed requirements are discussed with your approver before work proceeds.
How is the delivery schedule established?
The schedule is set after reviewing platform choices, user journeys, integrations, backend work and the approval process. Clear API notes and access to the technical owner help identify dependencies. The delivery plan then records review points and the decisions your team needs to make.
Can you guarantee approval of an app-store submission?
No. The relevant app stores control their review decisions and may change policy requirements or interpretation. We review crypto app-store policies before development, prepare the app and submission materials, and present those materials for your written sign-off before submission.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…