A private channel for project details
An OKX Wallet trending request begins as a confidential conversation about your project and intended placement. One named point of contact keeps the exchange composed, so your team has a clear person for questions, approvals and status.
Project identity, token details and campaign context remain within that working conversation until you approve what may be used for coordination. We do not treat supplied information as approved public copy. Any wording prepared for the placement is shown to you first; nothing proceeds without your sign-off.
The initial materials are practical: project or token name, chain, official links, and the OKX Wallet surface you have in mind. A reference or screenshot can help identify the requested surface, though it does not establish availability. Your contact can also note timing preferences and who is authorized to approve details. This discreet approach gives the review a clear boundary: your team supplies and confirms project facts, while we organize the request and explain what can be agreed.
A clear request before any arrangement
A useful OKX Wallet trending plan starts with an identifiable project and a precise description of the requested wallet surface. That distinction matters because “trending” can describe different displays, and a campaign should not proceed on an assumption about what the phrase means.
This is a wallet-focused placement, not an automatic extension to every discovery channel. If your plan also involves DEXTools trending or DEXScreener trending, each surface receives its own description and evidence expectations. A wider trending campaign plan can coordinate the conversation across channels while keeping each agreed placement distinct.
The review brings together the project identity, chain, official destination links, launch or milestone context, and any surface reference you can provide. We check these details for consistency and flag missing information before the written arrangement is prepared. Your team remains responsible for the accuracy of its claims and links; we keep the presentation coherent without inventing credentials.
The arrangement in three decisions
The arrangement moves through three approval points, with responsibilities made visible before coordination begins. This keeps the record readable for both your team and the person handling the request.
| Step | Who is involved | What you approve |
|---|---|---|
| Fit review | Your named contact and our point of contact | Project details, target surface and any clarifications |
| Written arrangement | Your authorized approver and our contact | Placement description, responsibilities and evidence approach |
| Coordination and closeout | Both contacts | Approved materials before use, then the delivery record |
The written arrangement states what is being coordinated, which materials are required, and how visible evidence will be shared. It also separates a confirmed placement from a request that remains pending. If your team needs to adjust the surface or timing assumptions, those changes are settled before activity is scheduled. A single authorized approver helps keep the correspondence measured and avoids conflicting instructions.
What remains in OKX Wallet’s hands?
OKX Wallet controls its interface, review decisions, ordering, refresh and rotation of displayed content. We can coordinate the agreed work and document a visible placement, but cannot promise that OKX Wallet will maintain a particular rank or display for a set duration.
For a related discovery plan, CoinMarketCap trending and CoinGecko search bar trending are separate placements, each requiring its own scope and verification. They can be considered alongside the wallet request, but one does not establish delivery on another. This distinction gives your team a composed record of what was agreed and what could be observed.
That boundary is specific to a wallet surface: the platform determines what appears and when its interface changes. The written arrangement therefore names the requested placement and the evidence used to assess delivery, rather than presenting an assumed ranking method as fact. If the available terms do not support a clear description, we raise that before you approve the arrangement.
A concise record for your team
The closeout record makes the agreed OKX Wallet work straightforward to assess. It brings together the surface reviewed, the placement description, coordination status and available evidence, with enough context to distinguish a visible display from a pending request.
The record may include the project details and target surface reviewed, the approved responsibilities and timing assumptions, and the materials supplied by your team. Where visible evidence is available, we share a capture with its relevant context. A short closing note records what was completed and any follow-up still outstanding. The format is settled in the written arrangement, so your team knows what to expect before coordination.
This is useful for internal launch reporting or for keeping a discreet record alongside other channel activity. Your named contact remains the point of contact through closeout, rather than handing your team between separate coordinators. For context on our broader working practice, see how we work. The result is a calm, reviewable account of the agreed work, not an inflated claim about visibility beyond the evidence.
Begin with the surface you have in mind
The most useful first exchange identifies the project and the OKX Wallet surface you want considered. From there, the named contact can clarify missing details, outline the review, and prepare a written arrangement for your approval.
A concise starting note can include the project or token name, chain, official links, any surface reference, and the person authorized to approve materials. If a screenshot helps identify the display, include it with the context in which you found it. The review then has a specific point of reference instead of relying on a general request for wallet visibility.
Confidential project details stay within the working conversation until you approve their use for coordination. If the arrangement is suitable, your contact will set out the requested placement, responsibilities and evidence approach for written sign-off. Share the OKX Wallet surface reference you have in mind, and your named contact will clarify the next approval privately.
How it works
- Share the project contextProvide the project identity, chain, official links and intended OKX Wallet surface. Identify the person authorized to approve project details.
- Clarify the requestYour named contact checks the information for gaps and asks focused questions. No campaign activity is scheduled during this review.
- Approve the arrangementReview the written placement description, responsibilities and evidence approach. Coordination proceeds after your sign-off.
- Coordinate and close outWe handle the agreed coordination and share available placement evidence with a concise note on what was completed.
Frequently asked questions
Can the written arrangement hold an OKX Wallet position in place?
No. OKX Wallet controls its interface, review decisions, ordering, refresh and rotation, so a particular rank or display duration cannot be promised. The written arrangement can define the work we coordinate and the evidence we provide. Your named contact will distinguish visible placement evidence from a request that is still pending.
Which project details should I keep within the private review?
Share the project or token name, chain, official contract address where relevant, website, social accounts and the wallet surface you mean. Include launch context and a reference image if you have one. Your named contact can flag gaps before any materials are approved for coordination.
How is OKX Wallet placement evidence presented?
The closeout record includes available visible evidence, such as a capture of the relevant surface with context, alongside a note describing completed work. The written arrangement defines the evidence approach in advance. It will distinguish a display that can be seen from a request that remains pending.
From a founder’s side, is this the same placement as DEXTools or DEXScreener trending?
No. OKX Wallet, DEXTools and DEXScreener are separate surfaces, and a wallet placement does not establish visibility on either discovery tool. Each requires a distinct description and evidence approach. Your contact can keep those requests separate if they are discussed within one campaign plan.
Can a project without a live token ask for a review?
Yes, a review can clarify whether the request can be described coherently. Share the product status, chain if applicable, official destination and launch context. The contact will identify any missing information before preparing an arrangement; a review alone does not establish that a placement is available.
When can OKX Wallet coordination be scheduled?
Timing is set after the requested surface, available placement terms and project materials have been reviewed. The written arrangement records timing assumptions and responsibilities before coordination starts. A single authorized approver on your side helps settle questions without changing the agreed sequence.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…